resultex

Why We Decline 50% of Requests & Why Founders Thank Us for It

by andrew yar

3 min to read

⚠️ Why We Decline 50% of Requests — and Why Founders Thank Us for It

‍

Most studios or agencies say yes to every brief. We don’t.

At Resultex, we say “no” to over 50% of incoming MVP requests.

Not because we’re harsh. Because we’ve seen what happens when founders build too soon:

🚫 Burned capital. Lost months. Confused users. Dead momentum.

What most founders think they need is a product. What they actually need is clarity, positioning, proof — and a system to move fast, test smart, and raise.

‍

In this article, you’ll learn:

Why most MVPs fail before they’re built
The 5 patterns we see that block momentum
How to spot the thinking gaps before they cost you
How to know if you’re actually ready to build

🧠 The #1 Myth: “If We Build It, They’ll Come”

‍

Let’s be brutally honest: most failed startups didn’t die because of execution. They died because of what they built — and when.

“Founders think they’re building a product. What they’re actually building is either momentum — or debt.”

That’s why we challenge requests before we code.
And many of the founders we turn down… later come back sharper, with validated insights, and ready to raise.

We don't protect our time. We protect yours.

‍

❌ The 5 Patterns That Break Momentum & Why We Watch for Them

‍

When founders come to us with MVP requests, we don’t just look at the idea — we look at the underlying assumptions. Often, those assumptions are cracked.
We’ve reviewed hundreds of early-stage decks, strategies, and product plans. We’ve seen the same issues repeat — not because founders aren’t smart, but because the startup ecosystem is filled with outdated myths.
Here are the 5 patterns we reject — and what we look for instead:

‍

1. “We want to launch the full version to impress investors”

This comes from a place of fear: if we don’t build everything, they won’t believe us.

But full builds without data are a red flag. They signal that you're trying to prove value through polish — not validation.

✅ What helps you move forward: A clearly defined hypothesis, and a build designed to test it. Investors invest in signal, not surface.

‍

2. “It’s like [X] but for [Y market]”

Sounds smart. But unless the new audience faces a clearly different pain or context, this is just mimicry with no insight.

✅ What helps you move forward: A market gap that’s not just demographic — but behavioral, emotional, or experiential.

‍

3. “We’ll launch with 3 roles and a feature set for scale”

This screams “we’re building for future complexity” — when we don’t yet know if there’s present-day demand.

✅ What helps you move forward: Ruthless focus. One user. One core value. One feedback loop.

‍

4. “We’ll figure out the positioning later”

Positioning isn't lipstick. It defines what the product is for, how it's shaped, and how it's perceived.

✅ What helps you move forward: A story so clear we could build around it. If we can’t pitch it, we can’t prototype it.

‍

5. “Once we build it, we’ll go fundraise”

Fundraising isn't about product maturity — it's about founder clarity.‍

✅ What helps you move forward: Traction-building happening in parallel with building — not after. Conversations, signals, curiosity from the market. How to Prove Traction Without Revenue